Woman waiting to proceed south at Sunset and Highland boulevards, LA, at approximately 11:59 a.m. one day in February 1997, photo by Andrew Bush
Seen in the light of the near terminal collapse of the automobile industry, made especially dramatic by the recent bankruptcy of General Motors, Andrew Bush’s photographs, featured in his book Drive, and in two recent shows in New York (at the Yossi Milo Gallery and the Julie Saul Gallery) remind us just how intimate we have become with our cars.
Yawning, talking, screaming, day-dreaming, smoking, smiling, or gazing: these are just some of the things that we do behind the wheel. We watch the road and perform thousands of infinitesimal neurological motor movements. We drive. We drive thu, we drive in, we drive by. We tell callers on our cell phones that we’re “on the road”, with all the epic grandeur that phrase connotes, even though it’s Saturday afternoon and we’re heading out to the shopping mall, the Little League field or to the pet store to pick up kibbles for the cat.
There is poignancy here. The halcyon days are now gone, the golden age of the automobile becoming clear in retrospect (I propose 1956–2009, i.e. from the birth of Interstate highway system to the recent collapse. RIP). These images document the swan song of that era.
Rather than being a nostalgic tribute to our culture’s most characteristic cars (the Ford Mustang, the Buick Electra, the Chevrolet Camaro, the Pontiac GTO, the 1969 Dodge Charger, etc.) these photographs are about something more than technology. They are about our relationship with these machines. Photographed on the open road, using a high powered flash mounted on the door frame of a car and a medium format film camera, these images are surprising in their ability to capture our close involvement with these automobiles, how we have merged with them both physically and emotionally.
These images probe a space that has been relatively undocumented: the private/public space of the car in motion, one of the most intensely personal public spaces in our modern landscape. We can all recall moments of exhilaration, pathos, fear, sex and death experienced in the interior of our cars — the place where we often have our most meaningful conversations, our most catastrophic arguments, and our deepest insights.
These photographs remind us of just how closely connected we have become to these machines, how they have become extensions of our very sense of self (a feeling of identity that the advertising industry has been exploring for years). We have become so close, in fact, that we can hardly see them for what they are — a symbiotic melding of plastic, steel, human flesh and blood (look at the bodies of these cars — pocked and dented and lined they are almost as expressive as our faces). We have made our tools and our tools have made us. It’s been over one hundred years since the combustion engine was first invented and we now eat, drink, talk and die in our cars as naturally as we do in our domestic spaces.
Man traveling southeast at approximately 68 mph on U.S. Route 101 someplace in southern California in the winter of 1997, photo by Andrew Bush
Person driving somewhere in the last decade of the previous millennium (whereabouts unknown), photo by Andrew Bush
There is another reason to admire these portraits; they invite conjecture. We gaze at these anonymous drivers and we wonder where they are going, where they have been, what their lives are like. Unlike photographs of people on the street, or sitting in their homes or offices, there is something about the fact that these subjects have been caught in motion that makes their unresolved narratives especially compelling. They are in media res, in the middle of things, and their frozen moment is more powerful and mysterious as a result.
Have a look at Walker Evan’s Many Are Called, portraits of riders on the New York subway from the late 1930 and early 1940s, and a useful historical precedent. Here faces and bodies are constrained. Their range of emotion is limited; these people can be grim, skeptical or amused but they are in public, surrounded by other passengers and a social formality serves to limit them (in a way that actually seems intriguing).
The subjects of Andrew Bush’s photographs, on the other hand, seem freer and more expressive but they are also appear more alone and anxious. They have gained their autonomy but at what price?
Man traveling southbound at 67 mph on U.S. Route 101 near Montecito, California, at 6:31 p.m. on or around the 28th of a summer month on a Sunday in 1994, photo by Andrew Bush
We all have our personal car stories. Babies put to sleep to the sounds of Radiohead; stolen kisses; accidents miraculously averted. I once met a woman who was going through a difficult divorce. She confessed to me that the only place she felt safe enough to cry was when she was driving alone in her car and traveling at 75 miles an hour. She was very specific about the speed; it had to be at 75 miles an hour — fast enough to feel that she could stay ahead of the other cars on the road, alone and independent and not able to be seen, but not too fast where she could lose control of the car. She’d drive out to the highway, reach 75 mph and, wham, all her pent up rage and pain would come bursting out. She’d cry and weep for hours, cross state lines, and then turn around and come home again, drained and exhausted. She drove a Saab, an irony that was not lost on her.
Adam Harrison Levy is a writer and documentary film-maker. He recently worked on the upcoming BBC2 series, The Genius of Design and produced Selling the Sixties, a BBC documentary about consumerism, advertising and culture of the early 1960s.
With this essay, Design Observer is pleased to announce that Adam Harrison Levy will be joining our regular stable of contributing writers. His previous essays on Design Observer may be found here.
Comments [11]
07.09.09
10:46
I was just thinking about modern cars and how cold/distant and just smooth they are (completely at odds with the photos depicted in this post). I just bought a Prius, and one thing I noticed is how many of them there are on the road and how few in variety of color, interiors, add-ons, etc...they area. I hope someone somewhere gets the big idea to tweak out and customize these kinds of cars and they can begin to integrate with our driving culture more. As we lose the relationship to the mechanical in favor of the digital, I think there is a desperate need for more texture, material and visceral bridge between person and machine. Will anyone in the future have a Prius (or other hybrid) that's all scratched up and dented for example? Will they stick around for 20 years layered and crusted with 21st Century angst and expression? Right now, I don't see it...
07.09.09
11:42
07.09.09
12:34
Link.
07.09.09
02:17
Through the '80s and into the '90s, there were billboards up all over L.A. with her picture on it and a phone number. She must have spent millions on these billboards.
07.09.09
05:08
she is also referenced in a funny song by a local band, MYNX, called "I'm So LA"
07.09.09
09:15
07.10.09
07:46
Nice post.
07.10.09
04:31
07.11.09
10:04
07.14.09
10:56
07.14.09
07:22